Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations

Equity Focus

This study targets the analysis of the Malaysian government's food environment policy in comparison to international best practices and the development of recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.

Case Summary

The project determined the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified
implementation gaps. The Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on ‘importance’ and ‘achievability’ criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher ‘achievability’ and ‘importance’ were set as priority recommendations for government action. Majority (62 %) of indicators was rated ‘low’ implementation with no indicator rated as either ‘high’ or ‘very little, if any’ in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children’s settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.

Lessons Learned

  • This first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability
    to create a healthier food environment.

LINK TO CASE STUDY Arrow right

Search results for Framework: Monitor: 11

CASE STUDY
2020

Implementation of healthy food environment policies to prevent nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana: National experts' assessment of government action

Flag Ghana
GHANA
CASE STUDY
2019

Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts' Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)

Flag Canada
CANADA
CASE STUDY
2019

An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018

Flag Global
GLOBAL
CASE STUDY
2019

The INFORMAS healthy food environment policy index (Food-EPI) in Mexico: An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations

Flag Mexico
MEXICO
CASE STUDY
2018

Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations

Flag Malaysia
MALAYSIA
CASE STUDY
2018

Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study

Flag New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND
CASE STUDY
2018

Changing the restaurant food environment to improve cardiovascular health in a rural community: implementation and evaluation of the Heart of New Ulm restaurant programme

Flag United States
UNITED STATES
CASE STUDY
2017

Exploring sales data during a healthy corner store intervention in Toronto: the Food Retail Environments Shaping Health (FRESH) project

Flag Canada
CANADA
CASE STUDY
2017

Level of implementation of best practice policies for creating healthy food environments: assessment by state and non-state actors in Thailand

Flag Thailand
THAILAND
CASE STUDY
2017

Progress Evaluation for the Restaurant Industry Assessed by a Voluntary Marketing-Mix and Choice-Architecture Framework That Offers Strategies to Nudge American Customers toward Healthy Food Environments, 2006-2017

Flag United States
UNITED STATES
CASE STUDY
2015

The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand

Flag New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND